'If guns are banned, then so should abortions, smoking cigarettes, drinking soda, and frankly, the freedom of speech.' The Freedom of Speech isn't something you can regulate and control. Why do you need a fully automated weapon to kill a so-called 'intruder'? Isn't a pistol enough? Last I remember, there never were a company of people who broke into a single home to find some cash. Don't you see the problem there? Regulation doesn't work.ДЄre all of you really defending not-banning weapons, because you can spend the next few years wasting yourself over tracer and Armour-piercing bullets? All there is to do? Go and shoot somebody. Really, if you allowed guns to be bought, you're just doing half of the criminal's job for them.

However, if such weapons were banned, motivation will dwindle as the perpetrator would need to go through many blackmarket and illegal places, which are maybe unreachable due to their lack of knowledge. Consider this, if a psychotic shooter saw an XM-15 Bushmaster sitting on his table, the intimidation and motivation would continue unabated. Some of you say, 'oh! Well if a criminal was hard enough they will find a weapon anyway!'. A time when the 'police' were not so wide spread as it is today. The 2nd Amendment and the 'Right to bear arms' was only approved to prevent others from entering property and committing treason. we live in the 21st century, it should be about time that we do something about old rules. You're looking at something that was adopted in 1791.

I see everybody keeps saying '2nd Amendment' this, '2nd Amendment' that.

10 crack commandments biggie smalls